Skip to main content

Ignoring the Message from Reality: Application of the 200 Day Moving Average Rule

“You always want to be with the predominant trend. My metric for everything that I look at is the 200-day moving average.” – Paul Tudor Jones

Being able to determine the market’s primary trend will put the odds in your favor to properly position your portfolio for future events. There are many ways to accurately identify a trend, however using the 200-day moving average* is one of the simplest yet most effective strategies. In fact, most Trend Following firms employ trading strategies that take an entry and, possibly, an exit based on a specified percentage close above or below the 200-day moving average, respectively. Moreover, the 200-day moving average can be an effective trading signal for all markets since Trend Followers are typically registered as Commodity Trading Advisors (CTA’s) that have exposure to equities, fixed income, currencies, as well as commodities.

Additionally, the 200-day moving average has been an effective signal throughout many market cycles. One study examined the S&P 500 (represented as SPY) in relation to its 200-day moving average from 1993 through 2014 and produced the following results: 

SPY Average Total Monthly Return when:
SPY is above 200-day moving average: +1.22%
SPY is below 200-day moving average: -0.15%

Additionally, when the monthly return series was above the 200-day moving average it exhibited less volatility, as defined by standard deviation. Specifically, when SPY was above its 200-day moving average its price displayed standard deviation of 3.44% and when below that value increased to 5.89%. The implication from this observation is that SPY will exhibit greater monthly price swings below its 200-day moving average than when it is above.

Both its effectiveness in multiple markets and the tested results throughout market history should implore traders to add the 200-Day Moving Average Rule to their tool chest for market analysis, if it is not there already. As Paul Tudor Jones says, “The whole trick in investing is: How do I keep from losing everything? If you use the 200-Day Moving Average Rule, then you get out. You play defense, and you get out.” In essence, the 200-day moving average signal can be effective in detecting the long-term trend as well as preserving your capital.

Current and Historical Observations:

Over the past ten years, it can be seen how the 200-day moving average of the S&P 500 (SPX) has provided a reliable indication of trend direction. For example, in late 2007 SPX began to vacillate around this moving average implying a range bound market for the near term and possible change of direction going forward. As it turns out, since the beginning of 2008 SPX only had one close above the 200-day moving average before entering into the Financial Crisis. The 200-day moving average cannot predict future events, however it can help traders and investors identify the market’s current direction and mitigate risk. Looking ahead, in 2009 SPX closed above its 200-day moving average and continued its uptrend from its 2009 lows until breaking the 200-day moving average in 2010. After a few months of consolidation the uptrend resumed before SPX closed below this level in 2011. Then, at the beginning of 2012 the price closed above the 200-day moving average again which resulted in a long, sustained uptrend that lasted until the Ebola panic of 2014 and more recently mid-2015. It should be noted that in each instance of a pre-defined close above the 200-day moving average, SPX was able to generate a profit before exhibiting a specified close below this line prompting a trader to exit the position. Additionally, the equity curve would have experienced less drawdown than the general market. As can be seen currently, SPX is displaying some indecision around its 200-day moving average and is clearly trendless. However, price will either continue downward, for which the 200-day moving average rule has already positioned traders defensively, or close above the line and signal a possible new uptrend. Only time will tell. For now, while price remains undecided with a slight downward bias, it is best to heed the advice from Paul Tudor Jones and “play defense.” 



*The 200-day moving average referenced in this post is categorized as a Simple Moving Average where the value is calculated by adding up the closing values of an instrument for the past 200 days and then dividing the sum by the number of observations (e.g. 200). While simple moving averages are useful and commonly used, there are some limitations. For example, as the moving average range of calculations is constantly shifting, the oldest data point is subject to the drop-off effect on a forward-looking basis. That is, the previously oldest data point is no longer considered and is replaced by the value of the most recent day’s closing price. This can cause some skew in the trend of the moving average when an old outlier event is no longer included or a new outlier event is weighted into the average. Some alternatives to simple moving averages include exponential moving averages, centered moving averages, and double-smoothed moving averages. Typically, exponential moving averages are used as an alternative to simple moving averages, while the latter two moving averages are employed when conducting cycle analysis.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions.

JD

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Research Review: Does Trend Following Work on Stocks?

In November 2005 Cole Wilcox and Eric Crittenden of Blackstar Funds LLC* (now Longboard Asset Management) published a research report analyzing the effectiveness in using a Trend Following   trading strategy in the US equity markets.   Both fund managers were using Trend Following successfully in the futures markets for many years.   Their success with Trend Following, as well as their peer's results in similar markets , piqued their curiosity and led them to conduct this research.   The strategy tested is a long-only Trend Following program. Trend Following uses absolute price change to delineate strength or weakness in a particular security. In this case, the researchers added long exposure on positive absolute price changes that resulted in an all-time high on a one week closing basis. Before actual testing began, Wilcox and Crittenden made sure to address any data issues. For example, given the expansive time horizon for testing, the authors account for security-sp

Managing Position Level Risk with Dr. Alexander Elder’s 2% Rule

Executing sound risk management principles in your trading is essential to having any chance of investment survival. If one position is sized too large and generates an enormous loss, this can be catastrophic to your account as well as your psychology as a trader. Fortunately, there are methods you can learn that will protect your account. In The New Trading for a Living , Dr. Alexander Elder proposes a method for controlling risk at the position level which he calls the 2% Rule. This guideline states that the total risk in any position cannot exceed 2% of the current month-end account value. For example, if you have $100,000 in your account at the end of the previous month, the 2% Rule limits your maximum risk on any trade to $2,000. That is, risk is defined as the dollar value of the difference between your purchase price and stop loss and cannot exceed 2% of the account value under this rule. Be sure to not confuse 2% with the total position size. While 2% may seem sm

Possible Kangaroo Tail Developing from Longer Term Perspective

Despite the title of this post, the curious development of animal anatomy will not be the topic of discussion. Instead, readers will have an opportunity to observe a potential reversal move underway in equity markets and crude oil delineated by this distinctive price action. No trend can last indefinitely and being able to spot signs of a reversal will help a trader better manage a position. One such method is identification of price action through what Dr. Alexander Elder describes as Kangaroo Tails. This sort of price behavior has a unique pattern. Elder states, “A Kangaroo Tail consists of a single, very tall bar, flanked by two regular bars, that protrudes from a tight weave of prices” (How to Trade for a Living, 65). Kangaroo tails that close down indicate a potential market top whereas when it closes up a possible reversal higher is developing. As with most patterns, price action on a long term basis usually carries more weight as it represents a general shift in the market