Skip to main content

Managing Position Level Risk with Dr. Alexander Elder’s 2% Rule

Executing sound risk management principles in your trading is essential to having any chance of investment survival. If one position is sized too large and generates an enormous loss, this can be catastrophic to your account as well as your psychology as a trader. Fortunately, there are methods you can learn that will protect your account.

In The New Trading for a Living, Dr. Alexander Elder proposes a method for controlling risk at the position level which he calls the 2% Rule. This guideline states that the total risk in any position cannot exceed 2% of the current month-end account value. For example, if you have $100,000 in your account at the end of the previous month, the 2% Rule limits your maximum risk on any trade to $2,000. That is, risk is defined as the dollar value of the difference between your purchase price and stop loss and cannot exceed 2% of the account value under this rule. Be sure to not confuse 2% with the total position size.



While 2% may seem small, Elder notes that most professional traders risk even less than 2% or closer to 1% per position. He adds, “Good traders tend to stay well below the 2% limit. Try to risk less than 2% - it is simply the maximum level.” Heed this advice and your risk management will provide you with a chance at trading success.

"Keeping your risk small and constant is absolutely critical" - Larry Hite 

In the world of professional trading, risk management is the most important element when designing a profitable trading strategy. Keeping risk per trade manageable can be accomplished by understanding the probabilities of your system. For example, knowing the probable number of losses in a row, winning percentage, and average gain to average loss of your system will help you minimize over-exposing your account to the market at inopportune times. Additionally, risk per position is determined by your proprietary position sizing algorithm and finding the optimal position size is based on your system’s past performance.

Furthermore, the 2% Rule links the size of your trades to your performance as well as account size. For example, if your hypothetical $100,000 account earned 5% last month then you would be able to risk $2,100 per trade going forward. That is, 2% of total account equity, $105,000, now equals $2,100. Conversely, if your account declines by 5% your total equity is now $95,000, you will only be able to risk $1,900 per trade idea. In effect, the 2% Rule will enable you to trade more when your system is in favor and less when it is out of sync with the market, thereby offering performance-based risk management.

An additional benefit to the 2% Rule can be found through helping traders learn to pyramid into a position. That is, traders may layer risk in a position through 50 basis point (bps) increments* ultimately topping out at 200bps or 2%. Leveraging up into a full position is a skill shared by all professional traders.

Begin adhering to the 2% Rule and you will be taking the right steps toward replicating professional money management. Keep your position sizes manageable for the well-being of your account and your emotions. Ultimately, the 2% Rule will enhance your chances of making trading profitable.

In a follow up post I will be discussing how Dr. Elder suggests traders manage risk at the portfolio level.


As always, please feel free to contact me with any comments or questions. Thanks for reading.

John


*Referred to as an inverted pyramid when compounding a position. This provides maximum leverage. (Trading Systems and Methods, Perry Kaufman)

Comments

  1. Hi John,

    Thanks for your blog. I would be grateful if you could help with a question I have.

    In the example below from Dr Elder's book, I am unclear why the number of shares is 1,000 rather than 133.33 (4,000 / $30) i.e. the 2% limit divided by the cost per share $30

    Thank you,
    Ephi

    Example:
    The 2% Rule forces you to limit your risk on any given trade to 2% of your account equity. Of course those of us who trade larger accounts tend risk a lot less than 2%, but this Rule sets the absolute maximum risk level.

    For example, if you are trading a $200,000 account, you cannot risk more than $4,000 on any trade. Suppose you buy a stock at $30 and put a stop at $26 – your risk is $4 per share. Now you have to divide your total permitted risk, which is $4,000, by your risk per share, which is $4. $4,000 divided by $4 comes to 1,000 shares – the 2% Rule dictates your maximum position size

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ephi,

      When using Dr. Elder's 2% Rule you divide the 2% of your trading capital by the potential loss on the trade; that is, the difference between the price you paid and your stop loss. In this case the dollar difference is $4. Therefore, you divide 2% of your trading capital (e.g. $4000) by $4 and get 1000 shares.

      In effect, this position sizing method neutralizes all dollar risk at the position level. That way you will have 2% at risk in any given position no matter the total size of the position.

      Let me know if that helps. Thanks for reaching out.

      John

      Delete
    2. Thanks very much John, that makes perfect sense now.

      Much appreciated.

      Ephi

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Research Review: Does Trend Following Work on Stocks?

In November 2005 Cole Wilcox and Eric Crittenden of Blackstar Funds LLC* (now Longboard Asset Management) published a research report analyzing the effectiveness in using a Trend Following   trading strategy in the US equity markets.   Both fund managers were using Trend Following successfully in the futures markets for many years.   Their success with Trend Following, as well as their peer's results in similar markets , piqued their curiosity and led them to conduct this research.   The strategy tested is a long-only Trend Following program. Trend Following uses absolute price change to delineate strength or weakness in a particular security. In this case, the researchers added long exposure on positive absolute price changes that resulted in an all-time high on a one week closing basis. Before actual testing began, Wilcox and Crittenden made sure to address any data issues. For example, given the expansive time horizon for testing, the authors account for security-sp

Possible Kangaroo Tail Developing from Longer Term Perspective

Despite the title of this post, the curious development of animal anatomy will not be the topic of discussion. Instead, readers will have an opportunity to observe a potential reversal move underway in equity markets and crude oil delineated by this distinctive price action. No trend can last indefinitely and being able to spot signs of a reversal will help a trader better manage a position. One such method is identification of price action through what Dr. Alexander Elder describes as Kangaroo Tails. This sort of price behavior has a unique pattern. Elder states, “A Kangaroo Tail consists of a single, very tall bar, flanked by two regular bars, that protrudes from a tight weave of prices” (How to Trade for a Living, 65). Kangaroo tails that close down indicate a potential market top whereas when it closes up a possible reversal higher is developing. As with most patterns, price action on a long term basis usually carries more weight as it represents a general shift in the market