Skip to main content

Double-Bottom Trade in Crude Oil

Since Crude Oil began its long-term decline in the early Fall of 2014, the commodity has yet to find meaningful support and forge a sustained reversal. However, the most recent lows in January and February 2016 appear to have formed a double bottom. This pattern can be constructive for future price action.

In Technical Analysis a double bottom is a price pattern that forms after a sustained downtrend makes a low, reverses higher, then retraces back to around the previous low, and finally proceeds to move higher again. The breakout from a double bottom is confirmed when the price moves off the second low to a point that is higher than the reversal peak from the first low. Sometimes the double bottom may be symmetrical and other times there can be some asymmetry between reversals.

Currently, Crude Oil is exhibiting asymmetry in its double bottom. Thomas Bulkowski coined the different price bases “Adam” and “Eve” depending on the shape of the move. “Adam” reversals are typically narrow and V-shaped, whereas “Eve” patterns develop more slowly and are more rounded. As can be seen, Crude Oil is displaying an Adam & Eve Double Bottom. In other words, there are two distinct valleys that look different.


Since the breakout from the double bottom at $36.00, Crude Oil has been consolidating in a range between $36 and $38 below its 100-Day Simple Moving Average. Despite the lack of immediate follow through, this behavior is actually constructive. “Sometimes price will confirm the double bottom and then waffle up and down, forming a handle. When price breaks out of this region it often moves up in a strong trend” (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns, Bulkowski). At the moment, Crude Oil is forming a handle as described by Bulkowski and based on past experience could be setting up for a sustained move higher.

Historically, the performance of an Adam & Eve Double Bottom is quite favorable. For example, Bulkowski notes that based on his experience the average gain per trade after the pattern completes is +37%. Additionally, double bottoms that form within a third of the yearly low perform the best.

In this example, the first entry point after Crude Oil completed its Double Bottom would have been around $36.00. An additional position could be opened above $38.00, a level that acted as resistance for the handle and corresponds with the 100-Day Simple Moving Average. While the statistics are favorable for this type of Double Bottom breakout, no trade is risk-free. Accordingly, your risk could be limited to either mid-range of the handle around $37.00, or a break of handle support, also the Double Bottom breakout level, of $36.00. The stop-loss choice will depend on your risk tolerance and position sizing algorithm.

After identifying this attractive trade set up and appropriately minimizing your risk, you should feel confident in adding some long exposure in Crude Oil to your account.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any comments or questions. Thanks for reading.


John

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Research Review: Does Trend Following Work on Stocks?

In November 2005 Cole Wilcox and Eric Crittenden of Blackstar Funds LLC* (now Longboard Asset Management) published a research report analyzing the effectiveness in using a Trend Following   trading strategy in the US equity markets.   Both fund managers were using Trend Following successfully in the futures markets for many years.   Their success with Trend Following, as well as their peer's results in similar markets , piqued their curiosity and led them to conduct this research.   The strategy tested is a long-only Trend Following program. Trend Following uses absolute price change to delineate strength or weakness in a particular security. In this case, the researchers added long exposure on positive absolute price changes that resulted in an all-time high on a one week closing basis. Before actual testing began, Wilcox and Crittenden made sure to address any data issues. For example, given the expansive time horizon for testing, the authors account ...

Managing Position Level Risk with Dr. Alexander Elder’s 2% Rule

Executing sound risk management principles in your trading is essential to having any chance of investment survival. If one position is sized too large and generates an enormous loss, this can be catastrophic to your account as well as your psychology as a trader. Fortunately, there are methods you can learn that will protect your account. In The New Trading for a Living , Dr. Alexander Elder proposes a method for controlling risk at the position level which he calls the 2% Rule. This guideline states that the total risk in any position cannot exceed 2% of the current month-end account value. For example, if you have $100,000 in your account at the end of the previous month, the 2% Rule limits your maximum risk on any trade to $2,000. That is, risk is defined as the dollar value of the difference between your purchase price and stop loss and cannot exceed 2% of the account value under this rule. Be sure to not confuse 2% with the total position size. While 2% may seem sm...

5 Ways to Develop Faster, Better as a Trader

Over the past ten years I tried a variety of trading styles before eventually finding my niche. Throughout that time many mistakes were made during my development as a trader. Looking back on a decade of learning I can identify five key areas that I wish I understood better. For new traders, putting these principles to work now may expedite your path to consistent profitability. 1)      Spend more time studying your trades Studying your trades is simply one of the best ways to enhance your learning process. After collecting enough trade data to analyze your strategy  (typically, 50-100 trades), you will begin to see patterns in your decision making or in your automated system that may be limiting your upside potential. As a general rule, trader and system developer Perry Kaufman advises  the more data the better when analyzing a system. In effect, the Law of Large Numbers states that there will be less chance of randomness in your analy...