Gold Retests Key Moving Average

For the second time in 2017 Gold (GLD) is testing resistance at its 200-day simple moving average (200SMA). Traders use the 200SMA as an important trend indicator. For example, identifying the slope of the 200SMA or the price relative to this moving average are useful trading techniques.

After rallying from late December 2016 to late February 2017, Gold encountered its first test of the 200SMA. Subsequently, the price backed off to previous support before touching its 200SMA again this week. In doing so, Gold formed a higher low at 114 which may be constructive for price action in the near-term.

Specifically, if Gold can close above its 200SMA look for another 10 points of potential upside or a retest of the 52-week highs around 130 over the coming weeks to months. However, continued faltering at the 200SMA should be taken as a sign of weakness and offer traders an opportunity to get short Gold in line with the longer term trend.

Zooming out to one order of magnitude longer we can see that the weekly time frame still has a bias for a downtrend. Over the past five years, previous tests of overhead resistance at the 200SMA have provided good strategic shorting opportunities. For example, we see the downtrend not only confirmed by the slope of the 200SMA but a continuous series of lower highs and lower lows in price during the 2013 to 2016 time period.

In late 2016 GLD formed a higher low from its previous weekly low in late 2015. However, this behavior is unconfirmed by MACD and RSI which could be indicative trend and internal weakness during the move up between the two lows at year-end 2015 and year-end 2016, respectively.

Furthermore, using one order of magnitude even larger the uptrend during the first half of 2016 appears to resemble a minor pullback against the long-term downtrend in price that began in late 2011.

Without a decisive close above the 200SMA Gold will likely remain within a trading range between 110 and 120. Once Gold takes out resistance or previous lows defined during the longer term downtrend there should be some better long-term trade set ups available to traders.

As with all trades, keep your portfolio risk minimized by risking only a small portion of your account on any trade. Also, position risk should be contained to an acceptable level to maintain emotional control as well as build an attractive risk-to-reward profile for your trading system.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any comments or questions. Thanks for reading.

John

Comments

Managing Position Level Risk with Dr. Alexander Elder’s 2% Rule

Executing sound risk management principles in your trading is essential to having any chance of investment survival. If one position is sized too large and generates an enormous loss, this can be catastrophic to your account as well as your psychology as a trader. Fortunately, there are methods you can learn that will protect your account. In The New Trading for a Living , Dr. Alexander Elder proposes a method for controlling risk at the position level which he calls the 2% Rule. This guideline states that the total risk in any position cannot exceed 2% of the current month-end account value. For example, if you have $100,000 in your account at the end of the previous month, the 2% Rule limits your maximum risk on any trade to $2,000. That is, risk is defined as the dollar value of the difference between your purchase price and stop loss and cannot exceed 2% of the account value under this rule. Be sure to not confuse 2% with the total position size. While 2% may seem sm...

Research Review: Does Trend Following Work on Stocks?

In November 2005 Cole Wilcox and Eric Crittenden of Blackstar Funds LLC* (now Longboard Asset Management) published a research report analyzing the effectiveness in using a Trend Following trading strategy in the US equity markets. Both fund managers were using Trend Following successfully in the futures markets for many years. Their success with Trend Following, as well as their peer's results in similar markets , piqued their curiosity and led them to conduct this research. The strategy tested is a long-only Trend Following program. Trend Following uses absolute price change to delineate strength or weakness in a particular security. In this case, the researchers added long exposure on positive absolute price changes that resulted in an all-time high on a one week closing basis. Before actual testing began, Wilcox and Crittenden made sure to address any data issues. For example, given the expansive time horizon for testing, the authors account ...

Minimizing Portfolio Risk with Dr. Alexander Elder’s 6% Rule

In The New Trading for a Living , Dr. Alexander Elder suggests two methods for controlling risk. Previously I wrote about how the 2% Rule will mitigate risk when building a position. Elder’s other risk guideline, the 6% Rule, can be used to minimize risk at the portfolio level. Just as the 2% Rule puts solid risk management in place at the position level, the 6% Rule provides a useful risk constraint for the entire portfolio. Specifically, the 6% Rule restricts traders from allowing total outstanding risk of all positions to exceed 6% of the portfolio value as of prior month-end. The 6% Rule protects your account from incurring a series of small losses that amount to one large, meaningful loss. For example, a 1% loss may seem innocuous however once a series of five or more of these accumulate in your account in one month the losses will begin to be felt both financially and psychologically. To an extent, the 6% Rule works against human nature. That is, as traders begin to...

A Discounted View

Search This Blog